- Empire
- Posts
- š Tokenize your territory
š Tokenize your territory
Wall Street has called dibs on even more blockchains
Brought to you by:
Happy Friday! To celebrate the impending weekend, weāve put together a new Friday format for you.
This time around, weāre diving headfirst into a new Avalanche partnership for Franklin Templeton, and the crew at Delphi give us all a cycle update.
And donāt forget to have your say with the poll at the end!
šŖ Carving up turf
A war is being fought over blockchain mindshare by two of Wall Streetās largest operators.
Some would say Franklin Templeton started it by rolling out a tokenized money market fund, FOBXX, on Stellar in 2021.
The fund, which buys government securities with customer cash thatās pooled via an official app, had $100 million in play at the start of last year.
Now FOBXX has over $424 million with 462 token holders, second only to BlackRockās newer offering on Ethereum, BUIDL, which has so far attracted $502.7 million from 17 token holders since it launched in March ā just as bitcoin was at all-time high.
Both BUIDL and FOBXX are the largest tokenized money market funds right now.
Crypto-native outfit Ondo follows with $282.3 million from a much larger userbase of 4,230 ā which makes sense considering itās available on both centralized and decentralized exchanges, unlike BUIDL and FOBXX.
Net flows for BlackRockās BUIDL are in orange and Franklin Templetonās FOBXX is in blue and pink. The faded purple line in the background shows the price of bitcoin since the start of 2023.
With Franklin Templeton expanding FOBXX to also operate on Avalanche, it seems that traditional finance giants are really in the business of marking their tokenization territories, even if thereās no rights to exclusivity.
Franklin Templeton now has Stellar (as does WisdomTree), Polygon and more recently Arbitrum, although nobody has subscribed to the fund through the latter so far. And BlackRock has Ethereum.
āWe think there's an exciting array of digital nation-states, and we think they're attacking and creating new solutions that exist because of the upgraded technology, and we want to partner across [that space],ā Roger Bayston, head of digital assets at Franklin Templeton, told us.
āWe think there's going to be lots of winners, because there's lots of business to do. If you're in the business of selling block space, then there's a lot of business to unfold. You have to have the right technology to optimize that.ā
And OK, all those networks are permissionless and anyone can build anything they like on them, including Wall Street.
But if carving out available liquidity is the name of the game for crypto-forward finance shops, then exactly who is launching what and where would be top of mind for executives planning the next move.
So, where to after Avalanche? If liquidity is truly a factor in those decisions, stablecoin supplies could offer some insight.
Not shown: Tron, BSC and Ethereum, which all have much larger stablecoin supplies but there seems to be little appetite for traditional finance to experiment with the first two.
It turns out that Avalanche and Polygon have practically the same stablecoin supplies of around $2 billion.
Base and Solana otherwise have $3.2 billion and $4 billion, slightly trailing Arbitrum, and theyād be our bets for where to next.
ā David Canellis
P.S. Can you do us a favor? Help us tailor Empire to best fit your interests. Fill out this survey.
Blockworks Research is conducting a survey to gain insight into the institutional staking landscape. This data will help industry leaders adopt their strategies as the industry matures.
If you're an institutional staker, we want to hear from you (and if youāre new to Blockworks Research, get 20% off of our service while youāre at it!)
š¤· IYKYK
On todayās Empire episode, Jason (Yanowitz, though Iād really hope you knew that by now) sat down with Anil Lulla, Yan Liberman, and JosĆ© Maria Macedo from Delphi to round out the week.
In crypto, Lulla said, donāt bother with a five or 10 year plan. If you need it, āyouāre not going to make it.ā
āThe tricky thing relative to previous cycles was just the fact that not everything goes up now, whereas beforeā¦ you just have to kind of be right and bet on the fastest horse,ā Liberman said.
And things have changed for a couple of reasons. One is pretty clear: People have āwised up,ā as Liberman put it. Folks can fall back on historical data in a way they havenāt previously been able to before, and āthereās an element of survivorship bias.ā
Thereās also less retail this time around, which certainly isnāt helping things.
But thatās not to rain on anyoneās parade: You can still be successful, you just canāt pull the same tactics as last cycle.
And now you know.
One other thing discussed on the pod was where weāre at in the cycle, with Delphiās Liberman still calling it āfairly early.ā This lines up with some of the reporting weāve presented in other editions. I then always have to ask, ābut where do we go then?ā and it feels like there are a lot of unknowns at this point.
Maybe weāll get some clarity next month and break out of the current sideways action weāre seeing at the moment. It seems a lot of bullishness stems from the potential for more TradFi adoption and regulatory clarity. Itās anecdotal, but other aspects of crypto appear to have taken the backseat for now.
Though Iām always curious, dear reader, if you have a different take. My inbox is open.
ā Katherine Ross
At Permissionless, hear executive leaders from Galaxy, BlackRock, and Coinbase on what they think about the future of crypto in the US.
What is the biggest theme yet to really pop this cycle? |