• Empire
  • Posts
  • šŸ• Tokenize your territory

šŸ• Tokenize your territory

Wall Street has called dibs on even more blockchains

Brought to you by:

Happy Friday! To celebrate the impending weekend, weā€™ve put together a new Friday format for you.

This time around, weā€™re diving headfirst into a new Avalanche partnership for Franklin Templeton, and the crew at Delphi give us all a cycle update. 

And donā€™t forget to have your say with the poll at the end!

šŸ”Ŗ Carving up turf

A war is being fought over blockchain mindshare by two of Wall Streetā€™s largest operators.

Some would say Franklin Templeton started it by rolling out a tokenized money market fund, FOBXX, on Stellar in 2021. 

The fund, which buys government securities with customer cash thatā€™s pooled via an official app, had $100 million in play at the start of last year. 

Now FOBXX has over $424 million with 462 token holders, second only to BlackRockā€™s newer offering on Ethereum, BUIDL, which has so far attracted $502.7 million from 17 token holders since it launched in March ā€” just as bitcoin was at all-time high.

Both BUIDL and FOBXX are the largest tokenized money market funds right now. 

Crypto-native outfit Ondo follows with $282.3 million from a much larger userbase of 4,230 ā€” which makes sense considering itā€™s available on both centralized and decentralized exchanges, unlike BUIDL and FOBXX.

Net flows for BlackRockā€™s BUIDL are in orange and Franklin Templetonā€™s FOBXX is in blue and pink. The faded purple line in the background shows the price of bitcoin since the start of 2023. 

With Franklin Templeton expanding FOBXX to also operate on Avalanche, it seems that traditional finance giants are really in the business of marking their tokenization territories, even if thereā€™s no rights to exclusivity.

Franklin Templeton now has Stellar (as does WisdomTree), Polygon and more recently Arbitrum, although nobody has subscribed to the fund through the latter so far. And BlackRock has Ethereum.

ā€œWe think there's an exciting array of digital nation-states, and we think they're attacking and creating new solutions that exist because of the upgraded technology, and we want to partner across [that space],ā€ Roger Bayston, head of digital assets at Franklin Templeton, told us.

ā€œWe think there's going to be lots of winners, because there's lots of business to do. If you're in the business of selling block space, then there's a lot of business to unfold. You have to have the right technology to optimize that.ā€

And OK, all those networks are permissionless and anyone can build anything they like on them, including Wall Street. 

But if carving out available liquidity is the name of the game for crypto-forward finance shops, then exactly who is launching what and where would be top of mind for executives planning the next move.

So, where to after Avalanche? If liquidity is truly a factor in those decisions, stablecoin supplies could offer some insight.

Not shown: Tron, BSC and Ethereum, which all have much larger stablecoin supplies but there seems to be little appetite for traditional finance to experiment with the first two.

It turns out that Avalanche and Polygon have practically the same stablecoin supplies of around $2 billion. 

Base and Solana otherwise have $3.2 billion and $4 billion, slightly trailing Arbitrum, and theyā€™d be our bets for where to next.

ā€” David Canellis

P.S. Can you do us a favor? Help us tailor Empire to best fit your interests. Fill out this survey.

Blockworks Research is conducting a survey to gain insight into the institutional staking landscape. This data will help industry leaders adopt their strategies as the industry matures.

If you're an institutional staker, we want to hear from you (and if youā€™re new to Blockworks Research, get 20% off of our service while youā€™re at it!)

šŸ¤· IYKYK

On todayā€™s Empire episode, Jason (Yanowitz, though Iā€™d really hope you knew that by now) sat down with Anil Lulla, Yan Liberman, and JosĆ© Maria Macedo from Delphi to round out the week. 

In crypto, Lulla said, donā€™t bother with a five or 10 year plan. If you need it, ā€œyouā€™re not going to make it.ā€

ā€œThe tricky thing relative to previous cycles was just the fact that not everything goes up now, whereas beforeā€¦ you just have to kind of be right and bet on the fastest horse,ā€ Liberman said. 

And things have changed for a couple of reasons. One is pretty clear: People have ā€œwised up,ā€ as Liberman put it. Folks can fall back on historical data in a way they havenā€™t previously been able to before, and ā€œthereā€™s an element of survivorship bias.ā€

Thereā€™s also less retail this time around, which certainly isnā€™t helping things. 

But thatā€™s not to rain on anyoneā€™s parade: You can still be successful, you just canā€™t pull the same tactics as last cycle. 

And now you know. 

One other thing discussed on the pod was where weā€™re at in the cycle, with Delphiā€™s Liberman still calling it ā€œfairly early.ā€ This lines up with some of the reporting weā€™ve presented in other editions. I then always have to ask, ā€œbut where do we go then?ā€ and it feels like there are a lot of unknowns at this point.

Maybe weā€™ll get some clarity next month and break out of the current sideways action weā€™re seeing at the moment. It seems a lot of bullishness stems from the potential for more TradFi adoption and regulatory clarity. Itā€™s anecdotal, but other aspects of crypto appear to have taken the backseat for now.

Though Iā€™m always curious, dear reader, if you have a different take. My inbox is open.

At Permissionless, hear executive leaders from Galaxy, BlackRock, and Coinbase on what they think about the future of crypto in the US.

What is the biggest theme yet to really pop this cycle?

Login or Subscribe to participate in polls.